Showing posts with label IPO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IPO. Show all posts

Saturday, 19 April 2014

Venture capital funding soars to levels last seen in dot-com bubble

Investors pour $9.5 billion into U.S. start-ups during the first quarter of 2014, the biggest amount since the second three months of 2001, when the so-called dot-com boom was gasping.

Investors poured $9.5 billion into 951 U.S. start-ups during the first three months of 2014, according to the latest MoneyTree report released Friday. Above, a customer uses the ride-sharing service Lyft, which received a new round of funding worth $60 million last year. (Ted S. Warren, AP / April 18, 2014)
SAN FRANCISCO — With venture capital funding reaching levels not seen since the days of the dot-com bubble, analysts say the question of whether the tech boom in Silicon Valley is on the verge of sputtering is getting harder to dismiss.

Investors poured $9.5 billion into 951 U.S. start-ups during the first three months of 2014, according to the latest MoneyTree report released Friday. That's the biggest amount of investment since the second quarter of 2001, when the so-called dot-com boom was gasping its final, dying breaths. In the dot-com boom and bust, some tech companies lost half of their market value while others went out of business.

The total amount of venture capital invested in the first quarter rose 12% compared with the previous quarter, and 57% from a year earlier. The MoneyTree survey is prepared every quarter by Pricewater house Coopers, the National Venture Capital Assn. and Thomson Reuters.
Of course, the tech world still has a long way to go before it reaches the mania of 2000, when $100 billion was invested in start-ups. But with initial public stock offerings on pace to double this year, the region's economy has been on a tear.

Although some analysts don't believe the tech sector is overheating, at least not yet, "there have been a lot more" companies that are going public or being bought out, said H.J. Parik, director of PwC's Southern California Emerging Company Services practice.
Software companies set the pace for the tech industry, bagging $4 billion in venture funding. That's a level not seen in that sector since the last quarter of 2000.

Not every part of tech fared equally well. Venture capitalists gave $2.3 billion to 219 Internet-specific companies during the first quarter of this year, down 5% in dollar terms from the fourth quarter of 2013.

In general, the number of companies striking deals dropped. That was an indication, Parik said, that venture capitalists were putting more money into fewer companies, such as investing in later-stage companies that were likely on the verge of an IPO or being acquired.
To that end, the biggest deals in the quarter included $900 million raised by software developer Cloudera, $250 million by app-based ride-sharing service Lyft, and $350 million by online storage service Dropbox.

At the same time, seed stage investments, or the initial capital poured into start-ups, dropped 64% in dollar terms and 41% in number of deals, indicating younger start-ups were probably finding it tougher to snag funding, according to the report.

The venture capital surge was reinforced by an IPO window that swung wide open during the first quarter. There have been 23 tech-related IPOs this year, which would put the industry on pace to reach 70 to 80 in 2014. That would be a dramatic increase from the 40 tech IPOs last year.
In recent weeks, there have been some signs of cooling in that IPO market as the tech-heavy Nasdaq Index has tumbled. As a result, some companies priced their offerings at the lower end of their expected range, and others cut the number of shares being offered.
Observers said it remains to been seen whether such moves could lead to a retrenchment in venture investing.

But for the moment, venture capitalists seemed intent on arming themselves to catch bigger prey. According to a report released Thursday by Dow Jones Venture Source, venture capitalists raised $9.6 billion during the first quarter of 2014.
That's more than double the amount raised in the last quarter of 2013.


Source:

Monday, 17 March 2014

Alibaba Loss Shows Need for Hong Kong Market to Change, Li Says


For Hong Kong exchange head Charles Li, losing what may be the biggest Internet offering in Chinese history shows the market needs to change its ways as it seeks to be the investment gateway to the world’s second-biggest economy.
“We need to ensure our markets continue to be relevant in the new era of economic development,” Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. (388) Chief Executive Officer Li said an an e-mailed statement today, after Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. unveiled plans to sell shares in the U.S. “We are proud of our tradition of respect for the rule of law and adherence to principles. However, we also need to find ways to make our market more responsive and competitive, particularly with respect to new economy or technology companies.”
Alibaba, China’s biggest e-commerce company that’s valued at as much as $200 billion by investment banks, had struggled to persuade Hong Kong’s regulator to approve its proposed governance structure. Brokering a compromise would have been a coup for Hong Kong Exchanges, which is home to the world’s worst-performing stock index this year and hasn’t hosted an initial share sale of more than $4 billion since October 2010.
“Alibaba is an amazing prospect and to be losing something of that size does show that maybe the overregulation in Hong Kong is detrimental,” Evan Lucas, Melbourne-based market strategist at trading services provider IG Ltd., said by phone. “Hong Kong is very much about protecting the credibility of its market. They are very, very stringent.”
Alibaba may consider a future listing in China should circumstances permit, the Hangzhou-based company said yesterday. The company founded by former English teacher Jack Ma had proposed that its partners nominate a majority of the board of directors, a system that isn’t allowed under Hong Kong rules.

China Gateway

Ernest Kong, a spokesman for the Securities and Futures Commission, which regulates the stock market, declined to comment.
Li, 52, is positioning Hong Kong as the investment link between China and the rest of the world, buying the London Metal Exchange for $2.2 billion in 2012 to expand the bourse’s operations into commodities and advocating that the city become a hub for offshore yuan trading amid competition from Singapore and Taipei.
“We have to consider possible changes where they might be necessary, with everything according to our due process,” he said today, noting that a committee investigating whether different shareholding structures should be permitted began its work independently of Alibaba.
The city needs a debate on how to handle “innovative companies,” including whether to allow them to have multiple share classes, Li said in October.

‘New Economy’

“Losing one or two listing candidates is not a big deal for Hong Kong, but losing a generation of companies from China’s new economy is,” he wrote in a blog post on the exchange’s website, saying the comments reflect his personal views, not those of the bourse’s board.
Weibo Corp., China’s biggest microblogging outlet with 129 million monthly active users, and retailing website JD.com Inc. are also planning U.S. share sales.
An Alibaba IPO could raise about HK$100 billion ($12.9 billion), Ernst & Young LLP said June 28. That would make it the world’s biggest first-time share offering since Facebook Inc. raised $16 billion in May 2012, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index (HSCEI) of Chinese shares traded in Hong Kong lost 14 percent this year through last week for the biggest decline among 93 global benchmark measures tracked by Bloomberg.

Tencent Surge

The Hang Seng Index sank 7.6 percent, the worst performance among 24 developed-market gauges behind Japan’s Topix index. The Hong Kong measure would have tumbled further if not for Tencent Holdings Ltd. (700), whose 14 percent rally was the biggest positive contributor to the index.
Tencent, Asia’s largest Internet company, was valued at $135 billion at the end of last week after a 261 percent rally since Dec. 30, 2011. It listed in Hong Kong in 2004.
Hong Kong Exchanges’ share sale pipeline will cushion some of the blow from losing Alibaba.
Tianhe Chemicals Group, a Chinese maker of lubricants and other specialty chemicals, filed an application for a $1 billion IPO in the city, two people with knowledge of the matter said last week. WH Group Ltd., the world’s biggest pork supplier, plans to seek as much as $6 billion from an offering in the first half, people with knowledge of the matter said in January.

A.S. Watson

A.S. Watson & Co., the pharmacy chain controlled by billionaire Li Ka-shing’s Hutchison Whampoa Ltd., said earlier this month it plans an IPO in Hong Kong and another location this year.
The number of initial share sales on Hong Kong’s main board jumped to 48 last quarter from 13 a year earlier, according to the bourse’s website. Still, the $18.9 billion raised by companies and their shareholders through IPOs in the city last year was down from $52.9 billion in 2010, data compiled by Bloomberg show.
Alibaba asked Hong Kong’s exchange to allow a partnership of executives and shareholders to nominate the majority of board members, a person with knowledge of the matter said in August. That would have enabled Ma and his management team to maintain control.
“The main issue with Alibaba is whether it’s going to be one company or missing out on all Internet-related companies,” said Jonas Kan, an analyst at Daiwa Securities Group Inc. in Hong Kong. “The single impact is not too substantial but the regulatory framework needs to evolve with time.”

Google, Facebook

Manchester United Plc was considering a Hong Kong listing in 2011 before ultimately picking the NYSE, where it has a two-class equity ownership structure that lets insiders retain control. Both Google Inc. and Facebook, which are listed on a U.S. market run by Nasdaq OMX Group Inc., also have two classes of stock.
U.S. companies with dual-share structures are subject to more stringent reporting requirements and a class-action litigation system, which does not exist in Hong Kong.
Hong Kong’s stance “could actually be beneficial in the medium to longer term,” said IG’s Lucas. “Yes, it’s money lost, but credibility is just as important these days.”
To contact the reporters on this story: Kana Nishizawa in Hong Kong at knishizawa5@bloomberg.net; Adam Haigh in Sydney at ahaigh1@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Sarah McDonald at smcdonald23@bloomberg.net Ben Scent
News Source: www.businessweek.com

Thursday, 13 March 2014

King Seeks Sugar Addicts

“Candy Crush Saga” takes just minutes to play. But a key question for investors considering shares in King Digital Entertainment’s float is just how long the games developer’s virtual sugar addicts keep coming back.
The staying power of games people play to fill idle minutes is surprisingly good. The top 10 grossing games on Apple’s U.S. App store have been there for on average 17 months. And King’s games have a better record at cracking the top 10 than other publishers’. Only three games made it into the Apple store’s top 10 in the last 12 months: two of them were King’s.
Nor do bookings on King’s games suddenly tank to zero overnight. King’s “Bubble Witch Saga”, which launched in September 2011, hit peak bookings after roughly six months, according to King’s investor presentation. But it is still making 70% of its peak bookings now.
Similarly, Candy Crush peaked eight months after launch but is still generating 80% of its peak bookings.
That doesn’t reduce the challenge of producing a perpetual string of hits.
But it might make King’s IPO slightly easier to swallow.
News Source: stream.wsj.com

Tuesday, 11 March 2014

Virtu IPO Poised to Make a (Multi-)Billionaire of Vinnie Viola


High-frequency trading could soon officially mint its first billionaire.
Vincent “Vinnie” Viola, the founder of Virtu Financial Inc., could have his stake valued at around $2 billion once the company sells shares to the public, according to two people familiar with the matter.
In a filing Monday, Virtu said it hoped to raise $100 million in an initial public offering, though that figure is just a placeholder that could change based on investor demand. The company will likely seek to raise between $200 million and $250 million, according to the people. At the high end of that range, Virtu would be valued at about $3 billion.
Mr. Viola owns almost 70% of the company.
Mr. Viola, a West Point graduate and owner of the Florida Panthers hockey team, is already wealthy, but the IPO would cement his status asone of the most successful figures within the high-speed trading industry.
Virtu is hoping that its stellar record – having just “one losing trading day” during a 1,238 trading-day period concluding at the end of December – will grab the interest of investors despite growing scrutiny of the high-frequency trading industry.
Virtu said in its prospectus that the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission was “looking into our trading during the period from July 2011 to November 2013.”
The CFTC is examining Virtu’s “participation in certain incentive programs offered by exchanges or venues during that time period.” Virtu said it didn’t believe it violated any statute or regulatory provision.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has also said it is looking into the impact of high-frequency traders on market stability and fairness.
In addition, a French regulator, Autorité des Marchés Financiers, is examining the 2009 trading activities of a company that eventually became part of Virtu, the prospectus said.
Virtu declined to comment on the regulatory inquiries.
Virtu describes itself as an electronic market-maker and says its strategy of providing continuous quotes to buyers and sellers adds liquidity to the market. The company is “market netural,” meaning it is not dependent on the direction of the market and does not make speculative investments.
That strategy has paid off in a big way. The company earned $182.2 million in net income in 2013 on revenues of $664.5 million, an increase in profits of 108% over the year before, according to the filing.
The biggest chunk of trading income came from U.S. stocks, which accounted for 27% of trading income, followed by 23% from global commodities and 20% from global currencies, the company said.
The IPO process will also shed more light on the leadership style of Mr. Viola, who rose from a pit trader at the New York Mercantile Exchange to become chairman of the company.
Virtu’s board of directors includes former exchange heavyweights Dick Grasso, former chairman and chief executive of the New York Stock Exchange, and Jack Sandner, former chairman of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Retired Army Gen. John Abizaid, the former head of the U.S. Central Command, is also a member and advises the company on leadership.
An aficionado of military history, Mr. Viola has taken top executives on trips to the sites of the Battle of Little Big Horn in Montana and Pointe du Hoc, where Army rangers assaulted German positions on the coast of Normandy, France.
Mr. Viola gained attention last year after paying $240 million for control the Florida Panthers of the National Hockey League. He put his Manhattan mansion on the market for $114 million in December.
News Source: stream.wsj.com